Out-Law Guide 3 min. read
05 Aug 2020, 2:54 pm
The disruption to construction projects in the UK stemming from the Covid-19 pandemic is likely to spur contractors and sub-contractors to consider whether they have any entitlement to compensation to cover the additional costs they have incurred. Not all Covid-19 related disruption will give rise to successful claims, however.
This is part of a series of guides from the specialist infrastructure lawyers at Pinsent Masons. Other guides published include on the topics of managing change and the importance of notices. Guides to follow will address the impact of Covid-19 on managing delay, acceleration, varying the terms of agreement, the differences between civil and common law approaches to construction project claims, and termination and suspension.
In essence, disruption is a reduction in productivity for which a contractor is not responsible. Restricted or piecemeal site access, out of sequence working and late provision of instructions are all examples of disruptive events which may well have occurred as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Disruptive events usually lead to other problems which further adversely affect productivity on site, such as the crowding of labour, idle labour and stacking of trades.
Whilst a reduction in productivity may lead to delay in the progress of the works and it is not unusual for claims for delay and disruption to be brought together, a disruption claim is distinguishable from a delay claim.
The purpose of a disruption claim is to recover additional costs incurred, or the losses suffered, as a result of a disruptive event. It is possible for work to be disrupted and for the works still to complete on time. In such instances a contractor will not have a claim for an extension of time and/or loss and/or expense but it may have a claim for the cost of the reduced efficiency of its workforce and additional costs incurred.
Disruption claims are not for time-related costs and should only include additional task-related costs resulting from the loss of productivity caused by the disruptive event. Disruption claims may fall under categories such as wasted expenditure, additional costs of labour or plant and unproductive management time.
A contractor considering bringing a disruption claim should first make reference to the court's guidance set out in the case of Walter Lilly v Mackay to determine whether there is any basis for a disruption claim to be made. In that case the court advised that in order to succeed in bringing a disruption claim, a contractor has to demonstrate on a balance of probabilities that:
Whilst there is no set way in preparing such a case and it is open to a contractor to choose whatever approach it chooses to support a reasonable assessment of the disruption caused, the following issues are likely to be determinative in any disruption claim:
The mere existence of the Covid-19 pandemic will not automatically result in an entitlement to additional money. However, depending on the terms of the relevant contract, actions taken by the parties as a result of the pandemic and measures introduced by authorities may entitle a contractor to claim.
16 Jul 2020
24 Jul 2020