Out-Law Legal Update
High Court guidance will reassure banks acting to freeze accounts suspected of holding proceeds of crime
Out-Law Guide | 30 Aug 2011 | 4:25 pm | 7 min. read
This guide was last updated in August 2018.
It should be noted, however, that a limited liability partnership (LLP) is a hybrid entity with characteristics falling between those of a company and those of a partnership. Like a company, an LLP is considered to be a body corporate and so a separate legal entity from the individuals or companies making up the partnership. However, the partners' individual liability is limited. Like a partnership, the relationship between the members of an LLP is governed by a partnership agreement and it does not have shareholders or directors.
Partnership relationships do no neatly fall into the regimes for either personal or corporate insolvency. Traditionally the law and practice of bankruptcy was applied to partnerships. Later, an unsatisfactory approach of applying the relevant provisions of UK personal and corporate insolvency law to insolvent partnerships - with some modifications - was taken. In 1994 the law surrounding partnership insolvency was consolidated under the Insolvent Partnerships Order (the Order). It was further modified by Amendment Orders in 2005, 2006 and twice in 2017 (The Deregulation Act 2015 and Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 (Consequential Amendments) (Savings) Regulations 2017, in force 6 April 2017 and Insolvency (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2017 in force 8 December 2017).
Under the Order, partnerships can be treated as legal entities in their own right for insolvency purposes. Importantly, the Order has extended procedures relating to voluntary arrangements and administrations to insolvent partnerships and the Amendment Orders apply the out-of-court administration procedure and the new terms of creditor decisions and deemed consent procedures to partnerships.
Due to the unique nature of a partnership, a creditor can pursue any one or more of the partners individually – as well as the partnership itself – for any partnership debt.
On the basis that in most respects LLPs are treated as corporate entities in the same way as companies, the insolvency regime applicable to them is governed by the legislation that applies to companies.
Tests for insolvent partnerships
The tests for an insolvent partnership are similar to the two generally accepted tests for an insolvent company. If a partnership is:
then the partnership is insolvent for the purposes of UK law.
A partnership will not be insolvent solely on the basis of one of its members being individually insolvent if it is itself able to pay its debts as they fall due or its assets are greater than its liabilities.
Partnership liquidation and partner bankruptcy
As explained above, partners are personally liable for the debts of a partnership. This means that the partnership can itself be wound up and bankruptcy orders can be made against the individual partners.
A creditor of a partnership can petition for either:
Alternatively, a creditor may choose to only pursue the partners for the debt by petitioning for the bankruptcy of one or more of the partners without petitioning for the partnership to be wound up. The partnership debt will be treated as the debt of the partner against whom the bankruptcy petition is presented.
A member of a partnership may also petition for the insolvent partnership to be wound up as an unregistered company with no action against the insolvent partners, or with action taken against the insolvent partners individually.
A creditor can only apply for a winding-up order against the partnership if that partnership has traded in England and Wales at any time in the three years before the petition is presented.
The concept of putting a partnership into administration was introduced by the Order. Before 1994, partnerships in financial difficulties were either liquidated or each partner individually was made bankrupt. Now, a viable partnership business may be able to survive as a going concern or can obtain the creditors' approval to enter into a voluntary arrangement for its debts.
Partnership administrations which began on or after 1 July 2005 now follow the corporate administration procedure, allowing for an administrator to be appointed out of court.
A partnership may be put into administration in one of the following ways:
Under the court procedure an administrator will only be appointed if the court accepts that the partnership is actually unable to pay its debts, unlike in the case of corporate insolvency where the court only needs to be satisfied that the company is likely to become unable to pay its debts. Where the administrator is appointed out of court, the members of the partnership have to sign a statutory declaration that the partnership is unable to pay its debts.
The effect of administration generally, and the procedures for stopping partnership activity – or moratorium - in relation to an insolvent partnership, closely resemble those that apply to corporate administrations. However, the moratorium will not prevent a creditor from bringing proceedings against a partner in respect of a partnership debt for which that partner is liable.
Partnership voluntary arrangements
The Order has also introduced the concept of the partnership voluntary arrangement (PVA). A partnership can enter into a binding debt-forgiveness arrangement or repayment schedule with its creditors instead of liquidation. This will likely result in an improved outcome for the creditors, and may allow the company to survive.
The partnership alone may be the subject of a PVA, or both the insolvent partnership and one or more of its partners can enter into a voluntary arrangement. This can be either an individual voluntary arrangement (IVA) if the partner is a person, or a company voluntary arrangement (CVA) where the partner is a company. If an IVA or a CVA is entered into alongside a PVA, the partners will be liable for their own debt as well as that of the partnership. The Order does not provided for a combined arrangement covering the partnership and its members, but this may be achieved by each of the members proposing interlocking voluntary arrangements with that of the partnership.
There is no moratorium available where a PVA is entered into, so this has proved an unattractive option for partnerships in financial difficulties. Consequently, they have only really been useful when dealing with large partnerships where entering into IVAs or CVAs with each partner would be too time-consuming and costly.
Limited Liability Partnerships
In many ways the process of insolvency for an LLP reflects that of a limited company. LLPs can enter into administration, go into receivership, be voluntarily or compulsorily wound up or propose a voluntary arrangement. The Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules which came into force on 6 April 2017 in relation to corporates, have only applied to LLPs from 8 December 2017.
The process for appointing administrators to an LLP is very similar to that for a company. An administrator may be appointed by the court on the application of the LLP itself, a creditor or both and may be appointed out of court by the LLP itself or by a creditor who holds a qualifying floating charge over the company. A qualifying floating charge holder must first give notice to any other floating charge holders before appointing an administrator out of court.
The effect of administration generally, and the moratorium provisions in relation to LLPs, follow those that apply to corporate administrations. However, as is the case for an ordinary partnership, the moratorium will not prevent a creditor from bringing proceedings against a partner in respect of a partnership debt for which the partner is liable.
Almost the same procedures apply to the winding-up of an LLP as do to the winding-up of a limited company. The LLP can be placed into members' voluntary liquidation if the members of the LLP declare solvency. If such a statement cannot be made, the creditors of the LLP can propose a creditors' voluntary liquidation.
There are special provisions, which are only applicable to LLPs in liquidation, which may allow an appointed liquidator to claim back any money withdrawn from the LLP by its members. This includes distribution of profit shares, salary, loan repayments, interest payments or any withdrawal of property belonging to the LLP. The liquidator's power to 'claw back' in this way applies when:
When considering whether these claw-back provisions should apply, the courts will take into account the level of knowledge, skill and experience that could be reasonably expected of a member of an LLP at that level as well as the individual member's own knowledge, skill and experience.
However, the member will not be liable unless that person knew or ought to have concluded that after each withdrawal there was no reasonable prospect of the LLP avoiding going into insolvent liquidation.
Liability of partners on insolvency
Partners and persons who have management control of partnerships or LLP businesses face the same sanctions as directors of limited companies for specific misconduct, and may be disqualified from office by virtue of the Order.
The court may disqualify a partner from office if that person is or was a partner in an insolvent partnership and his conduct as a partner - either taken alone, or together with his conduct in any other partnerships or as a director of a company - makes him unfit to be involved in the management of another company or partnership. Similarly, a member of an LLP may be disqualified from being a member of an LLP or a director of a company if that LLP has become insolvent and the court considers that the conduct of that member was such as to make that member unfit to be involved in the management of another LLP or company.
Partners and members of LLPs may also, in addition to their personal liabilities, be liable in the same way as directors of limited companies if they are found guilty of wrongful or fraudulent trading and liable top make a contribution to the assets of the partnership.
In the same way as there are restrictions on the reuse of company names, to prevent so-called phoenix company practices, restrictions will also apply on the reuse of LLP names where the original LLP has gone into insolvent liquidation.
Out-Law Legal Update