Care needs to be taken by those operating in the regulated sector to ensure that they are meeting the letter and intent of their reporting obligations, while at the same time ensuring that suspicious activity reports (SARs) submitted are of good quality and proportionate. The potential consequences of failure include an unlimited fine and, for individuals involved, up to five years imprisonment in addition to the obvious reputational consequences, so the risks associated with non-compliance are significant.
Reporting obligations on regulated firms
The updated guidance applies only to prosecutions under section 330 of POCA. This requires those in the regulated sector to report “money laundering” if they know or suspect, or have reasonable grounds for knowing or suspecting, that another person is engaged in money laundering; and that knowledge or suspicion is based on information acquired in the course of their business in the regulated sector. Failure to do so within a reasonable period is a specific criminal offence.
Section 330 prosecutions are rare, with only four during the period 2018-20 according to official figures. Prior to the recent update to the guidance, the practice appeared to be not to charge under section 330 where there was insufficient evidence to establish that money laundering itself was planned or undertaken. However, this approach has been the subject of some debate, as the language of the section does not appear to restrict the offence in this manner. All that is required is that the regulated body suspects that money laundering is planned or has taken place. This means that, where individuals in the regulated sector receive information giving rise to a suspicion of or providing reasonable grounds for suspecting that another is engaged in money laundering, an offence is committed by failing to make a disclosure, regardless of whether it subsequently transpires that the money laundering did not actually occur.
Those within the financial services sector must be particularly mindful of their regulatory obligations in respect of money laundering, particularly those individuals who hold the money laundering reporting officer senior management function. We are increasingly seeing greater scrutiny by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in this area with, in some cases, enquiries being raised by the FCA as to whether firms have sufficient capability and expertise to address money laundering issues.