Some clubs may have legitimate concerns that this will reveal commercially damaging information and will welcome that the IFR has confirmed it will give them the opportunity to first make representations about any sensitive information that they consider should not be made public. This issue often arises with other regulators, and clubs may wish to take swift legal action in some cases, if they feel the IFR is not taking the necessary steps to protect their commercially sensitive information.
Financial reporting
The FGA requires each club to submit to the IFR a strategic business plan for the period up to the end of the next season after the club makes its licence application, together with a financial plan. The IFR has now given more detail on the risk assessments that it will require clubs to carry out and report on in their financial plans.
Each club will need to stress-test their financial forecasts against potential adverse scenarios that could arise, and describe their mitigation plans for responding to them. All clubs will need to address three key risks as a minimum:
- Relegation – financial impact of relegation to a lower division;
- Withdrawal of owner funding – impact of loss of financial support from a principal owner;
- Significant revenue shock – impact of sudden reduction in turnover, such as reduced broadcasting revenue.
This could pose some difficult questions for the large number of clubs that operate at a loss and are heavily dependent on broadcasting revenue and/or the financial support of a generous owner for their survival.
Risk-based approach
The IFR has emphasised that its interventions will be focussed on clubs considered most at risk, as regards their financial sustainability. It will focus on two core factors in identifying clubs at risk: their source of funding, and their cashflow situation.
On a club’s source of funding, the IFR will look to assess if the source is reliable and stable; concentrated in coming from one or two providers; and whether it can readily be replaced if that source of funding is withdrawn. So, if a club is reliant on an unpredictable flow of income from a single owner which could not be easily replaced if that owner were to withdraw, then the IFR is likely to intervene to require the club to take steps to reduce its exposure to financial risk.
On cashflow, the IFR will require clubs to demonstrate they have sufficient access to cash resources to meet their cashflow needs – and provide stress-tested cashflow forecasts that demonstrate they are able to maintain short-term cashflow. If the IFR is not satisfied that a club has sufficiently robust cashflow plans in place, it is likely to intervene and require a club to hold a minimum cash reserve as a liquidity buffer, and/or reduce its debt or expenditure.
Next steps on the IFR licensing regime
The IFR has stated that its next step after this consultation will be to prepare a second consultation for spring 2026. This will provide further detail by way of draft rules and statutory guidance on the licensing regime, including templates for clubs to use for their licence applications and financial plans.
It then intends to publish the final rules and guidance on the licensing regime in summer 2026. The IFR will open its application window for clubs to submit their first license applications from November 2026, and no later than February 2027. Clubs will need to have secured their provisional licence from the IFR before the start of the 2027/28 season to operate a team in one of the top five tiers of English football in that season.