A new interpretation rule included in the Bill would ensure domestic legislation has priority over any former EU legislation and repeal the principle that domestic legislation should be interpreted consistently with former EU law. New processes would allow domestic courts to depart from legal precedent set by EU case law more often.
The Bill will also make it easier for ministers in the UK government and the devolved administrations to amend and replace retained EU law by secondary legislation, without the need to pass an Act of Parliament each time that major reforms are planned. The same powers can also be used to preserve some of the current effects of EU law.
In a statement, secretary of state for business, energy and industrial strategy, Jacob Rees-Mogg, said: ““Retained EU law was never intended to sit on the statute book indefinitely. The time is now right to bring the special status of retained EU law in the UK statute book to an end on 31st December 2023, in order to fully realise the opportunities of Brexit and to support the unique culture of innovation in the UK.”
The Bill will be debated in both houses of parliament over the coming months and could be amended in light of concerns raised over uncertainty that reforms might cause for businesses. One unnamed regulatory expert told the Financial Times last month that industry did not want to see a “bonfire of rules”.
David Thorneloe of Pinsent Masons said the Bill marks “a break from the continuity approach taken to date for maintaining retained EU law on the UK statute book after Brexit. Instead, it will end most of the special features of EU law, so that it is treated more like other domestic legislation. With a sunset date of December 2023 for these changes, the Bill fires the starting gun on an intensive and significant programme of legislative reform.”
“The Bill contains broad powers allowing the UK and devolved governments to reform retained EU law. These can be used in different ways for different sectors, so they could pave the way for reforms giving effect to new policy agendas, or they could be used to preserve the existing law where continuity is considered desirable,” Thorneloe added.