Notwithstanding recent events under the Fixed-term Parliaments Act, and indeed the potential for a majority Conservative government to repeal that legislation, as things currently stand the election will return a parliament of MPs who will serve for five years, until 2024.
Consider how much has changed over the past five years. Then ponder the amount of domestic policy that the government we are about to elect will have the time to pursue. Understanding what is on the menu policy-wise, beyond Brexit, is therefore of vital importance.
Thankfully, we will have a starter for ten when assessing the relative risks and opportunities that the domestic agendas of different political parties pose, in the form of their manifestos which will be published over the coming weeks.
Of course, election manifestos do not provide an exhaustive guide to what a party will do once in office - especially in the event of a coalition or minority government, where policy 'horse trading' will take place to secure partner parties' votes. However, they will provide a valuable steer on parties' broad approach to issues and sectors and, in many instances, sufficiently granular proposals to inform an organisation's risk register.
Turning to Brexit, certainly the result of the election will colour the UK's relations with Europe. A Conservative majority government would almost certainly see Boris Johnson's withdrawal agreement pass the House of Commons, opening a new phase of the saga in the form of trade negotiations and, domestically, heightened disquiet from other nations and regions of the UK - not least Scotland, which may envy Northern Ireland's continued close proximity to the EU and demand a similar settlement.
A Labour win, or a hung parliament in which Jeremy Corbyn was able to form a government with the support of smaller parties, would increase the prospect of second referenda, on EU membership and, potentially, Scottish independence.
Outside of the Westminster 'bubble', party manifestos are rarely read cover-to-cover. This year, though, they should be - especially as most eyes will be focussed elsewhere.
Andrew Henderson is a public policy expert at Pinsent Masons, the law firm behind Out-Law.