The spouse who moves out will then be under pressure to persuade the other to agree to the sale of the family home, and then to complete that sale, within nine months. This potentially creates an unfair advantage for the spouse who remains in the home, who could drag their heels in negotiations in order to apply pressure given the threat to the departing spouse of the looming CGT payment. In addition, if either spouse buys another property while the family home remains their main home, they will be required to pay the 3% stamp duty surcharge applicable to second homes.
What if the parties continue living together until the home is sold?
Continuing to live together during the divorce process in order to avoid CGT liability is unlikely to be pleasant for either party. It could also complicate the divorce process itself.
Divorce in England and Wales is a two-stage process. The court will first grant a 'decree nisi', confirming that there is no good reason why a couple cannot divorce, followed by a 'decree absolute', which formally divorces the couple. A minimum of six weeks must pass between the decree nisi and the decree absolute.
In practice, a decree nisi is often sought early on in the process, with decree absolute sought at a later date. If more than 12 months has passed since decree nisi was pronounced, a witness statement must be enclosed with the application for decree absolute confirming whether or not the couple has lived together since decree nisi. Given the length of time it can take to sell a house, couples may now be forced to explain their continued living together even though the relationship has ended.
The situation differs in Scotland, where divorce only requires a single decree. However, this will usually only be granted after the divorcing couple have sorted out their financial arrangements.
Kate Francis is a private wealth expert at Pinsent Masons, the law firm behind Out-Law.