UK life sciences after Brexit
Legal and regulatory divergence from the EU has always been a universally accepted consequence of Brexit; the UK choose sovereignty over regulatory alignment. What was less clear was the degree to which UK law might deviate from the bloc. However, the UK will not want to do anything that is inconsistent with its obligations in international and trade agreements including those in the Trade and Co-operation Agreement (TCA), its trade agreement with the EU.
The government has already announced proposals to change the clinical trials regime, remaining aligned with the new EU regime where appropriate. Ministers have committed and, in some cases, consulted with industry stakeholders on proposed changes to the medical devices framework, the falsified medicines regime and exhaustion principles. The Retained EU Law Bill potentially hastens change by enabling reforms to be made by secondary legislation, though with limited parliamentary scrutiny and no requirement to consult with stakeholders.
The future of life sciences regulation
Although some legislation relevant to the life sciences industry, like the Patents Act and the Trade Marks Act, will fall outside the scope of the Bill’s sunset clause, there are a number of relevant areas that do including, the general medicines regulatory framework, rules relating to supplementary protection certificates and exhaustion of rights – among others.
A thorough and thoughtful reflection on the UK's wider regulatory and legislative policy for the sector would be welcome but relevant government departments will need time and resources to consider, with stakeholders, the implications for the sector of any proposed reforms using powers under the Bill.
Engaging with the government
The Bill, which has already been passed by MPs, is currently being considered in the House of Lords, where it faces potentially significant amendments. Despite the progress of the Bill, there are still opportunities for organisations in the life sciences sector to engage with ministers on reforms to the Bill.
Many industry insiders are keen for the government to address the potential impact of the Bill in areas of law and regulation where divergence from EU could place the UK at an advantage. Ongoing reforms to EU legislation that is relevant to the life sciences sector, including those under the Pharma Strategy for Europe, add additional potential for divergence. UK firms will want to encourage the government to take account of relevant proposed reforms at the EU level when examining its own approach to life sciences regulation.
Co-written by Belinda Lavin and Angelika Gornikowska of Pinsent Masons.