In a legal battle between two major banks, England’s Commercial Court has ruled that documents that had apparently been printed from a computer system were not less valid than equivalent documents which were marked as originals.

The case concerned certain documents being presented by international bank Crédit Industriel et Commercial, known as CIC, to China Merchants Bank, one of the biggest and most profitable banks in China, known as CMB.

CMB refused the documents, alleging discrepancies because, among other things, “they were not obviously originals and were not marked as such, and hence had to be treated as copies.”

In answering the question of whether CMB was entitled to refuse the documents on these grounds, Justice David Steel found that it is not necessary in "the modern era with its word processors, laser printers, colour printers, scanners and so on," when documents are habitually produced by automated or computerised systems, for them to be marked as originals.

Justice Steel went on to rule that CMB was not allowed to rely upon any of the alleged discrepancies to refuse acceptance of the documents.

We are processing your request. \n Thank you for your patience. An error occurred. This could be due to inactivity on the page - please try again.