Audrey Ferrie of Pinsent Masons, the law firm behind Out-Law, said: "Limits for FOBTs have already been introduced so similar measures for online products could receive support from regulators, NHS and safer gambling organisations. This may be more difficult to enforce in the online sector, however, and the concern might be that if regulated products are not attractive to consumers, they will seek other markets."
The government is also considering whether to bring video game 'loot boxes' within the scope of gambling law in Great Britain. A committee of MPs last year said that loot boxes that can be bought with "real-world money" and the contents of which are unknown at the time of purchase should be considered to be "games of chance played for money's worth" and regulated as such.
The government has invited views on the positive or negative impact of gambling sponsorship arrangements across sport. It highlighted the right of sports clubs and bodies to benefit from commercial deals but also identified what it called "growing public concern about the relationship between sport and gambling".
The role and powers of the Gambling Commission is also under scrutiny in the review, with the government seeking evidence on whether the body has "sufficient investigation, enforcement and sanctioning powers to effect change in operator behaviour and raise standards".
Ferrie said: "The Gambling Commission already has very wide powers. It is allowed considerable leeway in the manner in which it undertakes investigations, for example, and operators are often unclear on issues such as possible sanctions and the levels of penalty. Perhaps a process which is more structured might benefit all."
The review will also look at evidence on the action customers can take where they feel operators have breached social responsibility requirements, which include intervening to protect customers showing clear signs of problematic play, and ensuring children and young people are kept safe from gambling-related harm. The government has hinted that a new ombudsman service could be considered to facilitate easier consumer redress.