Out-Law News | 04 May 2006 | 2:44 pm |
By Tony Smith for The Register.
This article has been reproduced with permission.
For its part, the chip giant said the US court has no jurisdiction in the matter. AMD, it said, has accused it of damaging the smaller chip maker's overseas sales, not sales made in the US. AMD's anti-trust action arises out of anti-competitive actions it maintains Intel took against it in Japan.
"Before subjecting Intel to the burden of defending its foreign business practices in a US court, AMD must meet the burden of establishing that this court has subject matter jurisdiction over AMD's foreign commerce claims," Intel said in a document submitted to the court.
AMD said in response that the case centres on actions allegedly perpetrated by one US company on another, and that makes the US court the ideal forum for the complaint to the aired and judged. It also maintained that Intel's alleged anti-competitive actions have global consequences. If the US consumer is affected, AMD has a right to pursue the case in a US court.
"Intel’s global exclusionary practices fall easily within the purview of US anti-trust laws and we expect that Intel’s motion will be denied," AMD said in a statement.
© The Register 2006