Out-Law News 1 min. read

Jury says Microsoft and Autodesk infringed patents


An entrepreneur has been awarded $133 million by a jury in a Texas courtroom after winning his claim that two of his anti-piracy software patents were infringed by Microsoft's Office and Windows XP and Autodesk's AutoCAD programs.

Advert: Infosecurity Europe, 25-27 April 2006, Olympia, LondonDavid Colvin is founder of z4 Technologies Inc., a digital rights management company based in “Automation Alley”, the high-tech centre of Michigan. The company exists to prevent infringement – and on a page of its website includes quotes from both Microsoft and Autodesk about the pest of piracy.

Colvin obtained patents for methods of assigning passwords and codes to individual copies of software to prevent unauthorised use. This week, Microsoft was ordered to pay him $115 million and Autodesk $18 million. The impact on their respective products is unknown.

Microsoft spokesperson Rachel Wayne told OUT-LAW.COM:

"While we are disappointed with this verdict, we continue to contend that there was no infringement of any kind and that the facts in this case show that Microsoft developed its own product activation technologies well before z4 Technologies filed for its patent.

"We will await resolution of all issues by the trial court before we make any decisions."

According to Reuters, Microsoft awaits the court's decision on whether z4 Technologies knowingly withheld information from the US Patent and Trademark Office about other companies' product activation technologies when submitting its patent applications.

In a separate decision earlier this week, a federal appeals court ruled that customers who bought computers with Microsoft's software preinstalled or who bought its programs through a reseller can't sue the Redmond company for antitrust violations. Twenty-six plaintiffs were seeking up to $10 billion in damages but lost because they were indirect purchasers.

We are processing your request. \n Thank you for your patience. An error occurred. This could be due to inactivity on the page - please try again.