Rambus, the US-based chip design company, has requested that a US court re-tries its recent legal dispute with German chip maker Infineon in which a judge dismissed all claims by Rambus that Infineon had infringed its patents and the jury then found Rambus guilty of fraud. Rambus argues that no reasonable jury would have sided with Infineon on the basis that Infineon failed to establish the requisite elements of fraud.

Rambus was held to have committed fraud by failing to disclose to an industry standards body that it had applied for patents covering memory chip technology.

Rambus also argues that according to Virginia state law, a fraud claim must be “filed within two years from actual enquiry or notice.” Rambus alleges that Infineon’s fraud claims result from knowledge of its patents that Infineon gained in 1997, therefore it was time-barred against raising the allegations.

Rambus also alleges that the judge in the case against Infineon misled the jury over previous patent law precedents.

We are processing your request. \n Thank you for your patience. An error occurred. This could be due to inactivity on the page - please try again.