A new principle, principle 7, states that signatories are expected to consider material ESG issues, including climate change, as part of their investment, monitoring, engagement and voting activities.
FRC chair Simon Dingemans said that the "ambitious" revisions "[mark] a step-change in the expectations for investors, their advisors, and how they manage investments for their savers and pensioners".
Corporate governance expert Martin Webster of Pinsent Masons, the law firm behind Out-Law, said: "Sir John Kingman called the Code 'well-intentioned' but 'not effective in practice'. He saw it as a driver of boilerplate reporting by large investors and, if that could not be changed, recommended that the Code be abolished. This is the FRC's response to that threat and, while they have ramped up what investors are asked to do, there must be some scepticism whether the risk of yet more boilerplate has been avoided".
"The FRC is a UK regulator. At least half the value of the UK stock market is held by overseas investors and it is not clear how much notice they will take of these new, more onerous, but still voluntary provisions," he said.
Tom Proverbs-Garbett of Pinsent Masons said: "The FRC makes clear in the introduction to the new Code that ESG factors, including climate change, have become a material issue for investors and, by implication, that this is of importance when fulfilling stewardship responsibilities".
"In addition to a principle devoted to ESG matters, the environment is explicitly mentioned in the very first principle as one of the areas in which 'good' stewardship should seek to provide long-term benefits. This reflects the increasing visibility and importance of ESG matters both for companies and their investors," he said.