Pinsent Masons successful at Supreme Court for Novo Banco

04 Jul 2018 | 11:01 am | 2 min. read

International law firm Pinsent Masons has successfully fought to see a Court of Appeal ruling upheld in the Supreme Court. The decision, handed down in the Supreme Court this morning, saw five judges unanimously uphold a ruling made in November 2016 that supported Portuguese bank Novo Banco’s challenge to an $850m claim brought by Goldman Sachs International and a group of investors in the English courts.

Novo Banco was created in August 2014 in the wake of the collapse of Banco Espirito Santo (BES).  In the first rescue of its kind in Europe, the Portuguese Central Bank, the Bank of Portugal, acting as resolution authority, exercised its powers under the EU Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (‘BRRD’) to create Novo Banco as a new bridge bank. 

The dispute centred on whether the obligations of BES under a facility agreement – which included an English jurisdiction clause – had transferred to Novo Banco or remained with BES, following various decisions by the Bank of Portugal. The Bank of Portugal had repeatedly determined that the liabilities had not transferred and accordingly remained with BES.  

The English Courts were asked to rule on how the BRRD (including its relation to Directive 2001/24/EC on the Reorganisation and Winding up of Credit Institutions), and therefore the decisions of the Bank of Portugal, should be construed. Goldman Sachs and the investors also sought a reference to the ECJ in the Supreme Court hearing. 

Goldman Sachs and the investors won at first instance, but that decision was unanimously overturned by three Court of Appeal judges and was upheld today by the Supreme Court. Lord Sumption (with whom Lord Mance, Lord Hodge, Lady Black and Lord Lloyd-Jones agreed) ruled that Goldman Sachs and the investors did not have the better of the argument that Novo Banco was party to the facility agreement. Lord Sumption also stated there was “no proper basis for a reference”.

The Court agreed that the decisions of the Bank of Portugal should be given the effect they have under Portuguese law, and that the correct place to challenge those decisions was in Portugal. Echoing the comments in the Court of Appeal, Lord Sumption stated that “[t]he scheme of the Directives would be undermined if the acts of a designated national Resolution Authority were open to challenge in every other member state simply because they were open to challenge in the home state.”

Stuart McNeill, a partner at Pinsent Masons representing Novo Banco in the case, said:
"This is the first case where the English courts were asked to consider how decisions made by another member state's resolution authority under the BRRD should be interpreted. The Directive is intended to provide a pan-European approach to rescuing banks and other financial institutions in difficulty, requiring member states to respect the decisions of the resolution authorities, many of which are central banks. The Supreme Court’s judgment has ramifications for other cases across Europe, and highlights the obvious danger (indeed potential chaos) of different courts interpreting the same decision of a single resolution authority in different ways.”

Pinsent Masons’ team was led by Stuart McNeill, with assistance from associate Caroline Hearn.

Latest press releases

Show me all press releases

Pinsent Masons has 2040 science-based net-zero target verified

Multinational law firm Pinsent Masons is one of the first law firms to have its global 2040 net-zero target verified by the Science Based Targets initiative, as it doubles down on efforts to reduce its impact on climate change.

Pinsent Masons is successful with City of Munich landmark Oktoberfest appeal

Multinational law firm Pinsent Masons is advising the City of Munich in appeal proceedings brought by the organisers of a planned Oktoberfest event in Dubai. The organisers provided cease-and-desist undertakings, thereby in effect accepting a preliminary injunction issued in this landmark case by the District Court in favour of the City of Munich.

Pinsent Masons advises Northern Gritstone on £215m fund raising

Multinational law firm Pinsent Masons has advised the new investment business Northern Gritstone, founded by the Universities of Leeds, Manchester and Sheffield, on its £215m fund raising.

People who viewed this press release also viewed

Show me all press releases

Pinsent Masons has 2040 science-based net-zero target verified

Multinational law firm Pinsent Masons is one of the first law firms to have its global 2040 net-zero target verified by the Science Based Targets initiative, as it doubles down on efforts to reduce its impact on climate change.

Pinsent Masons is successful with City of Munich landmark Oktoberfest appeal

Multinational law firm Pinsent Masons is advising the City of Munich in appeal proceedings brought by the organisers of a planned Oktoberfest event in Dubai. The organisers provided cease-and-desist undertakings, thereby in effect accepting a preliminary injunction issued in this landmark case by the District Court in favour of the City of Munich.

Pinsent Masons advises Northern Gritstone on £215m fund raising

Multinational law firm Pinsent Masons has advised the new investment business Northern Gritstone, founded by the Universities of Leeds, Manchester and Sheffield, on its £215m fund raising.

For all media enquiries, including arranging an interview with one of our spokespeople, please contact the press office on

+44 (0)20 7418 8199 or 

Location contacts