Alongside the hard figures, the result of this investment was a re-baselining of what the UK public and our politicians have come to consider as an acceptable level of activity from HMRC in pursuit of the minority of individuals who evade paying the tax that they owe – as well as a growing sense of belief within HMRC that it could rise to what had previously been seen as a seemingly insurmountable challenge.
Further money was awarded to HMRC as part of the 2015 Summer Budget to address serious and complex tax crime in respect of "wealthy" individuals - the 500,000 or so taxpayers earning more than £200,000 per annum or with net assets of over £2m - and companies. The following year, HMRC carried out a major restructuring exercise to create the Fraud Investigation Service - the first example of a tax administration unifying its criminal and high-end civil non-compliance operational functions under a single command structure.
The resulting strategic focus contributed to the creation of the 'Offshore, Corporate and Wealthy' directorate (OCW) within the Fraud Investigation Service in April 2016. OCW's alignment with the risks experienced in other parts of HMRC - including large business compliance – and its genuinely collaborative relationship with partner agencies such as the SFO and Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) allowed it to grow its compliance impact from £325m in 2016-17 to £560m in 2018-19. Perhaps even more impressively, the number of individual and corporate taxpayers under criminal investigation has increased eightfold, to well over 400.
Tax enforcement without borders
The OCW also sits at the heart of the UK's operational contribution to J5 activity. The J5, or Joint Chiefs of Global Tax Enforcement, is made up of the heads of tax enforcement administrations from the UK, the US, Australia, the Netherlands and Canada and was established in June 2018 in response to the OECD's call to action for countries to do more to tackle the enablers of tax crime.
The declared mission of the J5 is to combat transnational tax crime through increased enforcement collaborations. It considers that corporate and individual enablers of tax crime and money laundering, and certain offshore structures, pose a threat to the economic and fiscal interests of their countries. As such, they've set out to actively develop shared strategies and common data sharing platforms, specifically to drive coordinated simultaneous investigations to combat, disrupt and prevent serious non-compliance.
Already, J5 partners have commenced simultaneous operations to target over a dozen high-end enablers of tax evasion who likely believed themselves to be beyond the reach of traditional domestic law enforcement; cooperated across more than 50 other cases covering criminality ranging from money laundering to personal tax evasion; and have an advanced programme of work in place with international experts in data analysis and data science, looking to identify further high risk enablers of tax crime.
Significantly, OCW recently began delivering training on the CCO and the Bribery Act – key components of the UK's extraterritorial legislative criminal arsenal - to J5 investigators who are now equipped with an awareness of the relevant behaviours and indicators which will allow them to recognise and refer potential transgressions they encounter as part of their domestic triaging.
International investigations are complex, and 2020 will determine whether the J5's high level ambitions are on the right track. However, as an avid follower of this project, I wouldn't bet against it.
The corporate criminal offence
The corporate criminal offence (CCO) was introduced by the 2017 Criminal Finance Act, and is fast becoming a significant part of how HMRC's Fraud Investigation Service addresses the enabling of serious non-compliance.
Based on a similar offence in the Bribery Act, the CCO does not so much change the scope of what constitutes criminal conduct but rather impacts who may be held to account. Where UK tax evasion is believed to have been criminally facilitated by an 'associated person' - an employee or agent - of a company or other corporate body, that company will itself be criminally liable for failing to prevent that criminal facilitation, and subject to conviction, unlimited fines and the associated reputational legacy, unless it can demonstrate that it had reasonable prevention procedures in place to address that risk.
The CCO seeks to criminalise insufficiently robust corporate governance which results in the facilitation of evasion by dishonest staff. It isn't concerned with the finer points of tax law, but rather with how companies seek to assess, raise awareness of and prevent dishonest acts. Corporate knowledge of the evasion, intent or profit motive form no part of HMRC's initial criminal assessment.