JVs will be attractive because they will enable infrastructure companies to join forces with technology providers, among others, to pool their know-how, expertise, technology, people and capital to deliver projects. Inevitably, this model will entail data sharing.
To get the most valuable insights from data, it is best to use multiple datasets from multiple sources. Therefore contracts for data sharing should allow for the intentions of the parties. The contract terms could clarify what data can be used, who can use the data, including third parties, how it can be used and most importantly – for what purpose.
As companies realise more and more the value of data sharing, they may wish to look beyond the use of just contracts and consider other data sharing models that are being developed. The data trusts concept, which involves independent stewards pooling data from multiple providers and enabling access to and use of that data to others for a defined purpose, is one model that shows potential.
Building trust is vital for data sharing arrangements to succeed. Jeni Tennison of the ODI highlighted the risk to collaboration if businesses have underlying suspicion over how other parties will handle data or fear they will generate greater value from that data than they can. To build trust between parties, Tennison advised businesses to start by sharing on a small volume of low value, low risk reference data and to work together to develop data standards and on collaboratively maintaining the data. She said this can help businesses build trust to sharing other information in future, and that fears and suspicions of parties can also be addressed by involving someone independent.
Data risk
Data-related compliance will shape data sharing arrangements. Compliance should not be seen as a barrier to making the best use of data. However, it does require a business to get organised, focus the minds, and play fair. It is common to have business plans and asset registers, and there is a need for the same with data to gain the maximum benefit from it in a compliant way.
Infrastructure businesses that are able to show accountability for use of data, as is required in respect of personal data under data protection laws in many jurisdictions, will have the advantage of better knowing what data they hold as well as its quality for use and re-use.
Many infrastructure businesses in Europe will also find that they are subject to cybersecurity rules that apply to providers of 'essential services' in many sub-sectors of infrastructure, such as electricity and gas networks and healthcare systems. In such cases those providers are responsible for the security of the networks and information and are obliged to notify major security incidents to regulators.
Data-related risk is also increasingly extending into the sphere of competition law, including in cases where data is central to the way dominant companies in markets operate. There is increasing scrutiny of an organisation's ability to gain insight and knowledge from the data they hold; it is not just about the volume of information they have at their disposal. EU digital single market reforms envisage potential new measures to open up access to data.
Access to technology
It is not just about data considerations. To develop forward-looking business strategies, such as greater data usage, thought must be given to how the necessary technology and expertise is accessed. Digital transformation and data commercialisation depend on a range of technologies such as cloud computing, integrated circuits and the Internet of Things (IoT).