Out-Law News

City could be punished for refusal to link to another web site


A US Appeals court has ruled that the failure of a city’s web site to include a link to a site criticising local officials could contravene the Constitutional right to free speech.

A Tennessee publisher, Geoffrey Davidian, uses his newspaper, The Putnam Pit and its web site, PutnamPit.com, to accuse the local government of many forms of incompetence and corruption.

Davidian brought a court action against the City of Cookeville, Tennessee, in 1997 for refusing to include a link to his site on the city’s web site. The Cookville site linked to other local organisations.

Davidian claimed that his site was overlooked because city officials disagreed with his views. He argued that this infringed his rights under the First Amendment on free speech.

The case was initially rejected in 1998 but last week the Appeals Court decided that the dispute had merit and referred the case to the District Court for reconsideration.

The Appeals Court said that, according to US case law, if a web site can be seen as a city-owned forum, government officials have the right to make restrictions as to who may participate.

However, the judge ruled that the city may not do so “based on viewpoint... In other words, Davidian has no entitlement to a link to the city’s web site, however, he may not be denied one solely based on the controversial views he espouses”.

Since Davidian’s action was raised, the city has introduced a policy of only linking to sites which promote the city. At the time of the action, there was no linking policy.

We are processing your request. \n Thank you for your patience. An error occurred. This could be due to inactivity on the page - please try again.