Out-Law News 1 min. read
25 Apr 2006, 1:36 pm
The trade body identified concern amongst suppliers that the OGC's uniform model or 'one size fits all' approach, which is accompanied by a tendency to add further restrictions and conditions to model contracts, can tip the balance of risk allocation inappropriately.
This in turn can introduce unnecessary costs and inhibit flexibility in solution, provision and innovation, says Intellect. Such an approach misses the essential point that for a project/programme to be successful, the supplier and customer must work together to ensure their interests are in balance and the eventual goals are understood and agreed, it argues.
Intellect director Nick Kalisperas said: "Intellect believes changes should be made to the Office of Government Commerce's current version of the model contracts for major IT projects/programmes in order to create a framework that is in the best interest of both customers and suppliers."
The Intellect guidance outlines the main contracting principles, drawing on members' experiences from both the public and private sectors, and recommends behavioural issues which lead to more successful contracts.
"We hope that it will also contribute to government's own views of best practice in contracting which should be adopted by public sector customers," said Kalisperas. "The intention is that this accumulated knowledge can be used to guide the tailoring of contractual terms to fit particular needs and achieve a more balanced contract. This should maximise the chance of a successful project with both Customer and Supplier achieving their goals."
The publication, Contracting Best Practice – Guidance for Suppliers, addresses key objectives for contracting best practice:
The guidance was not available at Intellect's site at the time of writing.