“Organisations operating in this space should take note of the potential licensing scheme which has been proposed and the additional requirements that they may need to comply with in order to obtain and retain a licence to operate vehicles remotely,” said Gardner.
There is also scope for strict liability for companies operating vehicles remotely if they are involved in a collision. Remote driving companies could be subject to regulatory sanctions and prosecution in event of a collision, according to the paper, while victims should be protected by automatic compensation from insurers.
The Law Commission has proposed a ban on remote driving from overseas, citing the lack of enforcement powers internationally and safety concerns as its main rationale.
Short-term measures suggested by the Law Commission to urgently address gaps in the law include bringing in a new prohibition measure immediately on the use of remote driving technology where the driver is beyond line of sight, and imposing safety requirements for companies wanting to use remote driving without an in-vehicle safety driver through an application to the Vehicle Certification Agency.
“It should be noted that this is only a proposal at this stage. The onus is now on the government to take these proposals and develop them into law which will help mitigate current legal grey areas and create certainty for those operating in this space. However, this will require the necessary bandwidth within the government at a time when it is also dealing with a cost of living crisis, energy security concerns, a war in Ukraine, and continued fall out from Brexit – so whether there will be any near term developments remains to be seen,” said Gardner.
The Law Commission’s advice on remote driving is largely modelled on its 2022 recommendations on autonomous vehicles (AVs), which the government has adopted as part of its plans to roll out self-driving cars by 2025.