A new way to manage the aftermath of a data loss

Out-Law Analysis | 14 Apr 2010 | 9:14 am | 2 min. read

OPINION: For an interesting example of how to manage a data loss, have a look at what happened at the London Borough of Barnet.

This article was contributed to OUT-LAW.COM by Dr Chris Pounder of Amberhawk.

A loss of data involving 9,000 children followed a burglary of the home of a member of staff. The loss included the Council’s computer equipment (a laptop, CD-Roms and memory sticks) along with other items from the house.

Like most organisations, the Council had implemented procedures and policies to ensure that the personal data on the computer equipment and related portable media were encrypted. Unfortunately, in this case, there were unencrypted personal data stored on CDs and memory sticks which were stolen with the laptop.

As there had been a clear breach of Council policies, the member of staff concerned was suspended and data subjects (or in this case, the parents of data subjects) were contacted by a letter.

So what is new in this? Well, I think the new item is the public relations handling of data subjects (and parents). I think the Council formed the view that having reported the data loss to the parents (and presumably the Information Commissioner's Office), an Undertaking from the ICO would be a likely end-point of the process. Given this, it followed that the ICO’s publicity machine would be very likely to issue its usual press statement concerning details of the Council’s Undertaking (if there were to be one).

So instead of waiting for the inevitable, LB Barnet took the initiative. It published full details of the data loss on its website, invited data subjects to ask questions or exercise their right of access, gave details of what it was doing to remedy the situation and provided contact details for those who had questions. The letter to the parents of data subjects and the content of the website pages were either signed by the Chief Exec or approved by him.

In this way, the Council managed the bad news instead of the ICO managing it through his usual press release that accompanies an Undertaking. This means that if there were to be an Undertaking and if the ICO were to issue a press release then the subject is “old news”. In fact, is there a need for an Undertaking if the Chief Exec has publicly committed himself to do the things that the Undertaking would require of him?

Seizing the news agenda when there is a data loss is something that data controllers can consider. In addition, one can always follow the government’s example of  identifying “a very good day to bury bad news”. Issuing press releases at 4:00pm on a Friday or the day before a bank holiday is usually a good time for a press release to be missed.

By Chris Pounder, Director of Amberhawk Training. Amberhawk is providing update sessions on data protection law in association with Pinsent Masons in Manchester (26th April) and Edinburgh (10th May).