Out-Law Analysis 3 min. read

Coronavirus: directors' liability and insurance claims

As the disruptive effects of the coronavirus pandemic are felt by businesses around the world, business leaders are not only considering what to do immediately but also the potential long-term implications of their decisions.

From a liability perspective, the potential for claims against company directors after any crisis is always greater. While some of the impact on share prices cannot be avoided as the global economy faces a downturn, in volatile times it is even more important that board level decisions do not exacerbate any decline.

Publicly listed companies are already grappling with what information to share about the impact of disruption to their supply chains on their financial projections. In the US, the SEC has encouraged reporting companies and their auditors to disclose to investors the anticipated impact of the coronavirus, officially Covid-19, on company operations. The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) in the UK has published similar guidance, and we can anticipate action by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) where necessary to stabilise the markets – for example, recent temporary prohibitions on short selling.

Company directors and officers, or indeed the company itself, may hold directors' and officers' liability (D&O) insurance to indemnify themselves against losses relating to regulatory investigations by a financial regulator or a fall in value of the company. D&O policyholders may also face claims relating to cyber liability, employment liability and compensation claims following exposure to coronavirus-related disruption.

Financial claims

Last week, the FCA published guidance aimed at minimising the impact of coronavirus on customer finances. The guidance highlighted the potential for scams related to coronavirus including insurance policies, pension transfers or high-return investment opportunities, such as cryptoassets.

Criminals could perpetuate the same types of scams against companies that, with a depleted workforce, may be more susceptible to scams as they lack the resources to follow standard protocols. The board will need to consider whether they have adequate business resilience plans in place or face potential claims for mismanagement.

Hand Chamika_November 2019

Chamika Hand

Legal Director

While some of the impact on share prices cannot be avoided as the global economy faces a downturn, in volatile times it is even more important that board level decisions do not exacerbate any decline.

While many businesses are struggling as a result of the pandemic there has been a spike in demand for certain products such as hand sanitiser, and an increase in travel insurance purchases. The regulatory emphasis on treating customers fairly may well be tested in a market where demand outstrips supply and the conduct of companies is scrutinised. The FCA has published guidance on their expectations of insurers that sets out the need to treat customers fairly.

The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) published information for consumers and businesses about coronavirus-related financial services complaints earlier this month. While the guidance confirmed that, to date, the FOS has only seen a "handful" of complaints relating to coronavirus, it is continuing to monitor the situation. The FOS is anticipating future complaints about travel insurance policies, other types of medical insurance and goods and services bought with credit where, for example, an event has been cancelled and the customer has sought a refund from their credit provider.

Insurers may anticipate consumer claims to the FOS relating to declination of cover. On a commercial basis, they may also anticipate an increase in coverage litigation as cover for coronavirus-related claims is reviewed and restricted.

Employer liability claims

The way that companies treat their employees is also fertile ground for claims against individual directors and corporate entities. Various employer liability claims have impacted the scope of D&O policies over the years.

Employers will want to give careful thought to how they are minimising risk to employees as part of their plans to manage staff during this pandemic, including the risk of being exposed to coronavirus. This may include a review of company travel policies to ensure that employees are not put at additional risk, and putting in place opportunities for staff to work remotely should it be necessary to close offices for deep cleaning. The government has prepared guidance for employers and businesses on preventing the spread of the virus and what to do if infection is suspected.

Corporate governance claims

Section 172 of the 2006 Companies Act sets out some of the matters a director must have regard to in order to comply with their statutory duty to promote the success of the company. These include, among other matters:

  • the likely consequences of any decision in the long term;
  • the interests of the company's employees;
  • the company's business relationships with suppliers, customers and others;
  • the impact of the company's operations on the community and the environment;
  • company reputation;
  • the need to act fairly as between the members of the company.

The list does not appear to relate to the financial success of the company, and it is still largely uncertain exactly what "success" means and how it is measured. During the Act's passage through the UK parliament Lord Goldsmith, then attorney general, noted that for commercial companies "success" would normally mean "long term increase in value" but could also mean "achievement of a company’s objectives".

Directors and companies would be wise to keep these factors in consideration and under review if they are to avoid liability claims arising from the coronavirus pandemic.

We are processing your request. \n Thank you for your patience. An error occurred. This could be due to inactivity on the page - please try again.