Corporate governance expert Tom Proverbs-Garbett of Pinsent Masons said the government had made it clear it wanted to change the law in this area in its 2018 response to its insolvency and corporate governance consultation.
“It has taken some time to reach this point – given other well-understood priorities – but permitting investigation of the conduct of former directors of a dissolved company, without it being necessary to first restore a company to the register, is a welcome removal of a longstanding loophole. As respondents to the 2018 consultation recognised, although the dissolution process is an important part of making sure the register of companies is up to date, it should not permit people to escape liabilities or to avoid proper insolvency processes,” Proverbs-Garbett said.
Proverbs-Garbett said the legislation’s explanatory notes made it clear the measure was not necessarily intended as a response to large corporate failures, but rather to stop small and medium size enterprises from ‘gaming’ the system.
“It is directors of these small entities, unencumbered by a well-known name or public attention, which more commonly take the opportunity to dissolve their company, effectively shedding its liabilities, before incorporating a new company to continue business almost without pause,” Proverbs-Garbett said.
Restructuring law expert Nick Gavin-Brown of Pinsent Masons said: “The act has been accelerated into law in response to the concerns of widespread fraud in relation to the bounce back loan scheme, where the UK government has estimated around £4.9 billion of the £47 billion lent under the scheme may be lost to fraud.”