Arbitration seen as the best process for resolving international construction disputes

22 Nov 2019 | 12:49 pm | 3 min. read

Disputes arising in international construction projects are best resolved through arbitration however, there is real scope for improved efficiency at all stages of the process, according to a report published today by Queen Mary University of London in partnership with international law firm Pinsent Masons.

The results of the survey, which focussed on the issue of driving efficiency in international construction disputes, indicate that the more effective use of interim or provisional orders in arbitration may, in practice, lead to parties resolving these disputes at an earlier stage. The findings also show that there is appetite within the construction sector to make interim decisions binding so that money changes hands at an earlier stage.

The process of arbitration itself was seen by a significant number of respondents as being a barrier to the fair resolution of disputes valued at less than USD 10 million. Technical complexity was listed as a defining feature of international construction arbitration by 73 per cent of respondents. This was followed by the large amounts of evidence required (66 per cent), multiple claims or parties (49 per cent), and large amounts in dispute (41 per cent).

There were a range of opinions as to the minimum amount in dispute which respondents would consider commercially sensible to pursue through international arbitration. The majority (42 per cent) considered the minimum threshold to be between USD one million and USD 10 million. However, 43 per cent of in-house counsel put the threshold higher than this at between USD 11 and 25 million. 

When appointing arbitrators, the vast majority of respondents valued construction experience above all, supporting the survey's finding that factual and technical complexity is the most defining feature of international arbitration in the construction sector. When asked what characteristics respondents look for in an arbitrator, the top attributes were issuing an award within a reasonable period of time (70 per cent), being willing to make difficult decisions, including on procedural issues (68 per cent), possessing case and counsel management skills (68 per cent) and having technical knowledge of construction disputes (63 per cent).

Whilst there was an acknowledgement that technical automation may increase the efficiency of large volumes of evidence, there was resistance to the use of automating the entire decision making process. This shows that whilst there is an appetite for technology, there remains a resistance to the use of automating the entire decision-making process.

Respondents showed they had experienced a wide range of alternative dispute resolution processes used to resolve international construction disputes, although it is often the case that parties do not voluntarily comply with decisions issued as part of these processes. 41 per cent of respondents reported that parties do not voluntarily comply whilst 31 per cent reported that they experienced compliance 'half of the time'. Only 28 per cent of respondents reported that they experienced frequent compliance.

The majority of respondents (67 per cent) showed support, for mandatory compliance with pre-arbitral decisions as a pre-condition to arbitration.

Professor Loukas Mistelis, Clive M Schmitthoff Professor of Transnational Commercial Law and Arbitration at Queen Mary University of London said: "We were pleased to partner with Pinsent Masons for this empirical survey, whilst ensuring that it was conducted independently. In designing the survey, we received valuable input from a focus group of in-house counsel, external counsel, barristers, funders, expert witnesses, and institutions. We are grateful for the time the survey respondents devoted to completing the survey, and to those people that participated in the interviews or provided detailed written comments.

"This is a truly global survey, respondents were located in all continents and had experience in construction projects from all continents. We expect that the survey will have a meaningful impact on how dispute resolution is designed and conducted in the infrastructure and construction sectors."

Jason Hambury, Co - Head of Pinsent Masons' International Arbitration practice said, "We represent clients in international arbitrations around the world on disputes involving major energy and infrastructure projects and understand the importance of resolving those disputes as efficiently and economically as possible. The survey received positive engagement and responses from in-house counsel, practitioners, intermediaries and academics from different backgrounds and jurisdictions. It provides valuable insight on the concerns of the construction industry and how the arbitration community might respond to them to ensure that the arbitral process is more efficient and economical at all stages, and facilitates the resolution of disputes at an earlier stage. This is particularly the case for lower value disputes (i.e. less than USD 10m) where more flexibility and speed is required if arbitration is to be more accessible to parties, along with alternative processes such as Dispute Adjudication Boards, and serve the industry in this respect. I would like to thank all of those who have responded to the survey and participated in the interviews, which have contributed to an extremely thought provoking and insightful report."

Key Contacts

Jason Hambury

Jason Hambury

Partner, Co-head of International Arbitration

View Profile

Latest press releases

Show me all press releases

Pinsent Masons advises Ocean Winds on exclusive offshore wind joint venture with Bord na Móna

Multinational law firm Pinsent Masons has advised leading global offshore wind energy developer Ocean Winds on a partnership with Ireland’s climate solutions company Bord na Móna to develop projects that will generate up to 2.3GW of clean and renewable electricity to power up to 2.1million homes by 2030.

Pinsent Masons wins three awards at the British Legal Awards 2022

Multinational law firm Pinsent Masons won M&A Team of the Year (medium deal), TMT Team of the Year and Litigation & Dispute Resolution Team of the Year at the British Legal Awards 2022.

Supporting Young Lives initiative supports vulnerable children

Multinational law firm Pinsent Masons is spearheading the annual toy drive, Supporting Young Lives, to support vulnerable and disadvantaged children as the firm gears up to mark International Children’s Day 2022.

People who viewed this press release also viewed

Show me all press releases

Pinsent Masons hires energy and infrastructure partner in Johannesburg

Multinational law firm Pinsent Masons has hired energy and infrastructure partner Jannie de Villiers in its Johannesburg office.

Pinsent Masons wins Sustainable Business of Law award at FT Innovative Lawyer Awards Europe 2022

Multinational law firm Pinsent Masons has won the Sustainable Business of Law award at the FT Innovative Lawyer Awards Europe 2022 for its approach to ESG and its Climate and Sustainability group.

Pinsent Masons advises Cathexis on acquisition of Jones Engineering

Multinational law firm Pinsent Masons has advised Cathexis Holdings, LP on the acquisition of Jones Engineering Holdings International Limited.

For all media enquiries, including arranging an interview with one of our spokespeople, please contact the press office on

+44 (0)20 7418 8199 or 

Location contacts

We are processing your request. \n Thank you for your patience. An unknown error occurred, please input and try again.