05 Nov 2012 | 10:32 am | 2 min. read
• Starbucks and Google to appear before PAC on Monday 5 November to answer tax questions Foreign-owned companies represent almost half (44%) of the tax that HMRC believes might be underpaid by large companies says Pinsent Masons, the international law firm.
Pinsent Masons says that the figure undermines suggestions that HMRC takes a light touch approach to overseas businesses that operate in the UK.
Representatives from Starbucks and Google will appear before the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee on Monday 5 November to answer questions about their UK tax affairs.
Says Jason Collins, Head of Tax, of Pinsent Masons: “HMRC actively targets foreign-owned companies within the UK to see if they owe any extra tax.”
“There is the perception that HMRC and the Treasury are so eager to attract foreign companies to the UK that they are happy to take any tax payment that they get. That just isn’t the case.”
Information disclosed by HMRC shows that (as of March 31 2011) it estimated that large foreign-owned businesses are responsible for as much as £11billion of the £25billion that HMRC has identified as tax revenues that may be at risk from all large businesses in the UK*.
However, Pinsent Masons says that large, foreign-owned businesses are unlikely to have broken any UK laws in minimising their UK tax liabilities.
Jason Collins adds: “Only a fraction of that £11billion is actually owed to HMRC. Aggressive tax avoidance amongst large companies just isn’t as widespread as some would have us believe.”
"HMRC itself recognises that the £11bn is just the total tax ‘under consideration’ and its experience is that, when they look across all relevant issues under enquiry, only around half of the estimate of tax under consideration is eventually brought into charge.”
Following recent press reports about the low level of taxes paid in the UK by Starbucks, there have been calls for changes to transfer pricing rules to prevent tax deductions for the purchase goods or services between group companies in different countries – as has happened with Starbucks.
However, Pinsent Masons says that a rule change would be unnecessary.
Jason Collins explains: “The transfer pricing rules already prevent deductions for ‘excessive’ payments for goods and services between companies. Starbucks UK’s payment of a royalty fee to the Starbucks European headquarters for using the Starbucks brand isn’t out of the ordinary.”
“All the evidence is that HMRC is very proactive in challenging transfer pricing arrangements that it does not like. Besides, in HMRC’s overall list of priorities [see below] for missing tax, transfer pricing is quite low down.”
Jason Collins adds: “If you look at the UK operations of Starbucks, it pays a royalty fee of 6% of sales for the use of Starbucks’ intellectual property. It’s very similar to a franchise operation: a company like Subway, for example, charges its franchises 8% for the use of the Subway brand.”
Jason Collins says that foreign owned businesses do not get an easy ride from HMRC.
Explains Jason: “If anything there is a feeling that HMRC’s tough approach to businesses can put off possible inward investors.”
“HMRC enquiries into companies can be incredibly tense, time consuming, and, at times, confrontational.”
“The UK’s corporation tax rate may be becoming more competitive, but the UK will only fully benefit from that if we can prove to overseas companies that the compliance work of HMRC is not an unreasonable burden.”
*Through HMRC’s Large Business Service – the Large Business Service is responsible for the taxes paid by the 770 largest businesses in the UK. “Tax under consideration” may include both potentially underpaid tax and the risk to the Exchequer from companies litigating over amounts of tax they have overpaid.
Foreign owned companies and their UK tax bills
Areas of concern to HMRC - ranked in order of importance (based on available HMRC data)
Note: CFC issues have been excluded from the table above, as they are primarily relevant to UK-owned groups.
Multinational law firm Pinsent Masons has advised the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government as applicant in securing planning permission for a new national Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre to be located in central London.
Multinational law firm Pinsent Masons has launched a new working-from home audit tool to help financial services organisations understand the hidden litigation and regulatory risks associated with staff increasingly working from home on a more permanent basis.
Multinational law firm Pinsent Masons is advising Seraphine Group plc, an international digitally-led maternity and nursing wear, on its IPO and premium listing on the main market of the London Stock Exchange.
Multinational law firm Pinsent Masons has hired Gonzalo Gil Suarez in Madrid to lead the firm’s tax law practice in Spain.
The multinational law firm Pinsent Masons advises the holding company of the founder Dr Hardy Walle on the sale of all shares of Bodymed AG to Nestlé Health Science.
Multinational law firm Pinsent Masons has advised the shareholders of Goodtill on its sale to SumUp
For all media enquiries, including arranging an interview with one of our spokespeople, please contact the press office on