Phillips said: “For all the criticism that followed Kwasi Kwarteng’s growth plan, his announcement of plans to support onshore wind development in England again was a real boost to the UK’s energy security and the decarbonisation agenda. A number of bodies, from the Committee for Climate Change to the National Infrastructure Commission and National Infrastructure Planning Association (NIPA), have called for the reinstatement of onshore wind to the mix of low carbon generation in England, and onshore wind was also backed as a key building block of the UK’s future energy mix in the government’s own energy white paper in 2020.”
“By linking his government’s position on onshore wind to the 2019 manifesto, prepared before the Covid pandemic, Ukraine war, and the rapid escalation of energy prices, Sunak appears to have ignored those material considerations and cast doubt on whether the planning reforms Kwarteng announced will be taken forward. This will create uncertainty for developers and investors,” he said.
While the government’s UK’s energy security strategy, updated earlier this year, ruled out “wholesale changes to current planning regulations” in England to support onshore wind development, it set out the government’s plans to “consult this year on developing local partnerships for a limited number of supportive communities who wish to host new onshore wind infrastructure in return for benefits, including lower energy bills”.
Speaking immediately after meeting with King Charles, Sunak admitted that the UK is in a "profound economic crisis". That acknowledgement followed the High Court’s ruling that the UK government’s net zero strategy is unlawful as it is in breach of the Climate Change Act. The court ruled that the strategy does not outline how climate policies will meet legally binding carbon budgets, as is required under the 2008 Act.
Following the ruling Jacob Rees-Mogg, the then energy secretary, announced he would drop plans to appeal against the High Court’s decision, accepting that the strategy was unlawful. This means the government must now draw up a new net zero strategy by March 2023, to reach its legally binding target for 2050.
“If the position in the energy security strategy conveys the very limited approach the government will take under Sunak’s leadership, it would be extremely disappointing. It is also difficult to justify that position given that the new net zero plan will need to provide details of how the 2050 target could be achieved. All forms of renewable energy generation should be given specific targets, which contribute to the overall strategy. The ‘profound economic crisis’ calls for the brakes to be taken off the deployment of renewable energy projects, to help achieve sustained investment and growth in addition to decarbonisation and energy security. To continue to exclude onshore wind from the energy mix simply isn’t supported by evidence and arguably would not constitute rational decision making,” Phillips said.